01
Responsible-investment rankings
Asset managers
Score how asset managers govern climate, biodiversity and social risk across the funds they steward.
Turn a configurable methodology into deterministic, defensible scores — A–F tiers, four-eyes review and a right of reply for every organisation — then publish immutable results straight into an investor portal.
Portfolio grade · deterministic · four-eyes verified
One continuous lifecycle, end to end — configure the methodology, assess every organisation, review under four eyes, publish an immutable result, and put it in front of investors. The same engine carries it the whole way.
Frameworks, indicators and weightings are modelled exactly as your researchers define them — no spreadsheets, no bespoke build. Each benchmark gets its own configurable methodology that stays the single source of truth.
Analysts capture evidence against each indicator, with real source data attached. Deterministic scoring runs across three modes and resolves to clear A–F tiers — the same inputs always produce the same result.
Same inputs · same result · one A–F tier
Nothing reaches a league table on one person's word. Every assessment is independently checked under four-eyes review, and companies get a structured right-of-reply before anything is finalised.
Author + independent reviewer · right-of-reply resolved
Once signed off, the league table is published as an immutable output — a fixed, citable record of what was scored, how, and when. The data behind every rank stays auditable for good.
Sealed · sha 0x9f3c · cycle 24
Published benchmarks flow straight into the investor portal, where asset owners and managers explore rankings, compare organisations and track movement across rounds — directly from the source.
One configurable lifecycle for every benchmark you run — across as many organisations, sectors and cycles as your research demands.
Sign in to the platformEvery published score is reproducible: the same responses always resolve to the same tier. Analysts choose the rollup that fits the framework — the engine keeps it auditable, point by point.
How Weighted mean resolves
Each indicator is weighted by materiality, then averaged — the default for nuanced, multi-theme frameworks.
No hidden curve, no quiet re-weighting after publication. The rollup rule, the weights and the thresholds are configured up front and recorded with every result — so a tier can always be traced back to the responses that produced it.
Configure the methodology, score deterministically, run four-eyes review and company right-of-reply, then publish immutable league tables — the same end-to-end engine whatever you rate, from responsible-investment rankings to sector health indices.
Scoring modes
Weighted-mean, standards-met or points-cap — your methodology, your choice.
A–F grade bands
One configurable league-table scale across every study.
Output formats
Report, ranking, dataset, scorecard and briefing — versioned and immutable.
01
Asset managers
Score how asset managers govern climate, biodiversity and social risk across the funds they steward.
02
Insurers
Assess whether insurers price, underwrite and disclose the climate and nature risks they help create.
03
Banks & lenders
Measure how banks align lending and capital-markets activity with a credible transition to net zero.
04
Asset managers
Track how managers actually vote on environmental and social shareholder resolutions, year over year.
05
Retailers & producers
Benchmark companies on the health and sustainability of the products and services they sell.
Every published benchmark resolves into live dashboards and league tables — ranked, tiered and traceable. Drill from a headline grade into pillar-level detail, then watch the gaps and the trajectory across reporting cycles.
Meridian Asset Mgmt
Northwind Insurance
Caldera Holdings
Brightmoor Retail
Halcyon Energy
Gap analysis isolates where an entity trails its tier — here, Action and Impact drag the headline grade, even with strong governance.
Public benchmarks carry consequences. Every figure BenchmarkOS publishes is defensible — backed by a recorded trail, reviewed by more than one pair of eyes, and sealed the moment it goes out.
Every edit, score and decision is recorded with who, what and when — a complete, queryable history behind each published result.
No score reaches publication on a single pair of hands. A second reviewer signs off before anything moves forward.
Analysts, reviewers and administrators each see exactly what their role allows — and nothing it does not.
A second verification step protects every account, keeping research and respondent data behind a hardened front door.
Once a benchmark is published, its figures are sealed. Restatements are versioned in the open — never overwritten in silence.
Schedule findings to release on the moment they matter, with previews limited to named recipients until the embargo lifts.
methodology.version.lockedjust nowassessment.approved2mindicator.response.updated6muser.role.granted14massessment.returned23mpublication.created41mGovernance built in, not bolted on — every release stands up to scrutiny.